Browsed by
Tag: ITC

Latest GST circular puts an end to confusion over new input tax credit rules

Latest GST circular puts an end to confusion over new input tax credit rules

In a big relief for GST taxpayers, the Union government on Monday clarified the new rules related to availing input tax credit under the GST. It said that a certain category of Input Tax Credit claims such as ITC in respect of the IGST paid on imports and GST paid under the reverse charge mechanism have been kept out of the scope of the new rules introduced last month. The new rules implemented by the CBIC limited input tax credit claims to 20% of the eligible amount where invoice matching has been done. However, the notification issued by the CBIC on October 9 caused a lot of confusion over the method of calculating this 20% amount, the cut-off date and also whether it was to be calculated supplier-wise or on a consolidated basis. These concerns prompted the CBIC’s GST policy wing to issue a new circular today clarifying all these aspects.

“This circular clarifies a few points and will be of help to GST payers,” said Pritam Mahure, a Pune based chartered accountant.

The circular issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes (CBIC) also clarified that this 20% cap on the eligible Input Tax Credit will not be calculated supplier-wise and GST payers can avail the input tax credit on a consolidated basis.

The Modi government had received complaints that some businesses were availing input tax credit by using fake GST invoices. In order to check the problem of misuse of input tax credit system, the CBEC, the nodal body to implement indirect taxes in the country, had last month made it compulsory to match the invoices uploaded by the suppliers in their GSTR1 forms before buyers can avail Input Tax Credit in their GSTR-3 returns. However, it also allowed the buyers to claim 20% more input tax credit over and above the eligible amount where invoice matching was done but the lack of clarity over the method of calculation created confusion among GST payers.

The CBIC’s latest circular is intended at clarifying all these aspects. For example, if a buyer is entitled to avail input tax credit of Rs 10 lakh on inward supplies (purchases) in a month but if his suppliers have only uploaded the correct invoices in respect of supplies of Rs 6 lakh only in the GSTR1 forms uploaded by them, then the buyer can avail ITC of Rs 6 lakh plus 20% of the eligible amount that is Rs 1.2 lakh. Therefore the buyer could claim a total ITC of Rs 7.2 lakh in the month.

It also clarified that the total amount of ITC, even after the addition of 20% input tax credit over and above the eligible amount where invoice matching has been done, cannot exceed the total amount of input tax credit that can be claimed.

For example, if a buyer is entitled to ITC of Rs 10 lakh on inward supplies and invoice matching is done in case of Rs 9 lakh then as per the 20% cap rule, he is also entitled to avail 20% over and above the eligible amount of Rs 9 lakh, which is 1.8 lakh in this case. However, this can take the total amount of ITC to be availed by him in the month to Rs 10.8 lakh, Rs 80,000 more than the total ITC amount that can be claimed. The new circular has clarified that in any case ITC claims will be restricted to the total amount due.

For example, if a buyer is entitled to ITC of Rs 10 lakh on inward supplies and invoice matching is done in case of Rs 9 lakh then as per the 20% cap rule, he is also entitled to avail 20% over and above the eligible amount of Rs 9 lakh, which is 1.8 lakh in this case. However, this can take the total amount of ITC to be availed by him in the month to Rs 10.8 lakh, Rs 80,000 more than the total ITC amount that can be claimed. The new circular has clarified that in any case ITC claims will be restricted to the total amount due.

The latest GST circular also clarified three distinct cases where the newly introduced rule to cap ITC to 20% over and above the eligible amount will not be applicable.

Where new GST Input Tax Credit rule will not be applicable
The cap of 20% on availing input tax credit under the GST rule 36, sub-rule (4) introduced on October 9 will not be applicable on three cases:

1. ITC in respect of the IGST paid on imports and these importers can directly avail the input tax credit;

2. The cap of 20% will also not apply to those cases where GST has been paid under the Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) and;

3. The ceiling of 20% on availing ITC will also not apply on Input Service Distributors (ISD), these are those businesses that receive invoices on behalf of the services used by their branches and subordinate offices.

Source: Financial-Express.

XaTTaX is Best GST Software, Simplify your Financial matters with GST eFiling Software for Return Filing & GST Billing Software in India.

  • Automate Invoicing and get Paid Faster
  • Integration with all popular accounting software
  • Manage your GST and E-WayBill Software anytime anywhere using multiple devices

Get Our GST Software DEMO and E-WAY BILL DEMO for FREE

Punjab and Haryana HC directs GST Department to Re-Open Facility to File or Revise Tran-1 either Electronically or Manually

Punjab and Haryana HC directs GST Department to Re-Open Facility to File or Revise Tran-1 either Electronically or Manually

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has directed Goods and Services ( GST ) department to file or revise Tran-1 either electronically or manually.

The High Court was hearing a bunch of Petitions, which Petitioners are registered under Central/State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and seeking direction under Article 226 of Constitution of India to Respondents to permit carry forward of unutilized CENVAT credit of duty paid under Central Excise Act, 1944 and Input Tax Credit of VAT paid under PVAT Act, 2005 or HVAT Act, 2003 which could not be carry forwarded on account of non-filing or incorrect filing of prescribed statutory Form i.e. TRAN-1 by the stipulated last date i.e. 27.12.2017.

The division bench comprising of Justice Jaswant Singh and Justice Lalit Batra directed to permit the writ applicants to allow filing of declaration in form GST TRAN-1 and GST TRAN-2 so as to enable them to claim transitional credit of the eligible duties in respect of the inputs held in stock on the appointed day in terms of Section 140(3) of the Act.

The Court also ruled that, “the due date contemplated under Rule 117 of the CGST Rules for the purposes of claiming transitional credit is procedural in nature and thus should not be construed as a mandatory provision”.

While concluding the Judgment, the Court also directed Respondents to permit the Petitioners to file or revise where already filed incorrect TRAN-1 either electronically or manually statutory Form(s) TRAN-1 on or before 30th November 2019.

“The Respondents are at liberty to verify the genuineness of claim of Petitioners but nobody shall be denied to carry forward the legitimate claim of CENVAT / ITC on the ground of non-filing of TRAN-I by 27.12.2017”, the Court also added.

Source: Taxscan.

XaTTaX is Best GST Software, Simplify your Financial matters with GST eFiling Software for Return Filing & GST Billing Software in India.

  • Automate Invoicing and get Paid Faster
  • Integration with all popular accounting software
  • Manage your GST and E-WayBill Software anytime anywhere using multiple devices

Get Our GST Software DEMO and E-WAY BILL DEMO for FREE

Central GST busts fake invoice racket worth R14cr

Central GST busts fake invoice racket worth R14cr

A fake Goods and Services Tax (GST) invoice scam of Rs 14 crore was unearthed by the Central GST commisionerate where the suspects used it for fraudulently claiming input tax credit (ITC).

The scam came to surface during the course of action by the squads of the Central GST where a Chandwad-based firm M/s Gonglu Agro Pvt Ltd had received fake GST invoices worth Rs 5.58 crore.

Later, the Central GST commisionerate found that this firm was also involved in issuance of fake GST invoices. “During investigation we found that this Chandwad-based firm was involved in issuance of fake GST invoices. The firm has issued fake GST invoices of around Rs 70 crore to facilitate passing on bogus ITC of Rs 8.4 crore,” an official from the Central GST department said.

The Central GST department has arrested the managing director of the company, Rahoul Jain, and is investigating the case to find whether other firms are also involved in such practices of providing fake GST invoice to facilitate bogus claims of the ITC.

The Nashik divisional office of the Central GST (erstwhile office of Central excise, service tax and customs) has jurisdiction across five districts — Nashik, Ahmednagar, Dhule, Jalgaon and Nandurbar.
There are over 1.10 lakh businesses registered in the district of which 60,000 businesses are registered with the Nashik divisional office of the state GST, while remaining 53,591 are registered with the divisional office of the Central GST.

The new tax regime GST came into effect from July 1, 2017 replacing the multiple indirect taxes and traders with turnover of below Rs 20 lakh were exempted from GST, while those with annual business turnover up to Rs 1 crore are eligible for composition scheme.

The GST council made several changes in the past following introduction of GST and the exemption limit had was increased from Rs 20 lakh to Rs 40 lakh and only those businesses with turnover of above Rs 40 lakh are under the tax net.

Source: Times-Of-India.

XaTTaX is Best GST Software, Simplify your Financial matters with GST eFiling Software for Return Filing & GST Billing Software in India.

  • Automate Invoicing and get Paid Faster
  • Integration with all popular accounting software
  • Manage your GST and E-WayBill Software anytime anywhere using multiple devices

Get Our GST Software DEMO and E-WAY BILL DEMO for FREE

GST fraud unearthed; arrest made in fake invoices scam worth over Rs 100 crore

GST fraud unearthed; arrest made in fake invoices scam worth over Rs 100 crore

The Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) has arrested two persons for being involved in fake invoices racket. The taxable value of these invoices were Rs 931 crore and they fraudulently availed the Input Tax Credit (ITC) amounting to Rs 127 crore through a complex web chain of various entities, said a statement by the Ministry of Finance. The two persons – Gulshan Dhingra, resident of Ramesh Nagar, New Delhi and Sanjay Dhingra, resident of Punjabi Bagh, New Delhi — were arrested by the Gurugram Zonal Unit of the DGGI. The accused are said to have formed separate entities in the name of their employees or dummy persons and generated fake invoices without actual movement of goods, namely ferrous/ non-ferrous scrap, ingots, nickel cathode, etc., thereby causing loss to exchequer by evasion of GST.

The statement also says that Gulshan Dhingra and Sanjay Dhingra availed this fraudulent ITC to offset their GST liability and also passed on such fraudulent ITC to further buyers who availed the same to discharge their GST liability against their outward supplies with a motive to defraud the Government exchequer. During the course of the investigation, their employees and dummy persons did not admit to knowing about the movement of the above mentioned goods.

The above crime has been classified as cognizable and non-bailable offences and after producing the accused before Judicial Magistrate in Gurugram Court on 07 October 2019, they have been sent them to judicial custody till 19 October 2019 for further investigation.

The incident has come to light only three days after a racket of generating fake GST invoices for fraudulently claiming the input tax credit on non-supplied goods was busted in Pune, where two persons were taken into custody. The alleged fraud was believed to be around Rs 700 crore. The two firms – M/s Reliable Multi trading and M/s Himalaya Tradelinks- had obtained GST registrations and together issued fake GST invoices of approximately Rs 700 crore with the GST component of Rs 54 crore to facilitate bogus input tax credit.

Source: Financial-Express

XaTTaX is Best GST Software, Simplify your Financial matters with GST eFiling Software for Return Filing & GST Billing Software in India.

  • Automate Invoicing and get Paid Faster
  • Integration with all popular accounting software
  • Manage your GST and E-WayBill Software anytime anywhere using multiple devices

Get Our GST Software DEMO and E-WAY BILL DEMO for FREE

Input tax credit under GST regime restricted to 20% of claims: CBIC

Input tax credit under GST regime restricted to 20% of claims: CBIC

Businesses will have to pursue their vendors on a monthly basis to upload their invoices to enable them to take the entire input tax credit (ITC) after the indirect tax board came out with a notification to restrict these credits to 20 per cent of the claims.

Concerned at dwindling revenues, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) put this condition on the claims where vendors have not uploaded their invoices within a month.

Experts said it would block cash flow of businesses and increase their compliance burden.

Though theoretically, businesses have to reconcile their ITC within 60 days, this clause was never implemented since the auto-populated form of purchases by suppliers — GSTR2 — has been suspended.

As such, businesses are supposed to reconcile their input tax credit at the time of annual returns. However, the deadline of annual returns even for the first year of the GST rollout — 2017-18 — have been deferred a number of times. This means that there was no restriction on the businesses to claim their input tax credit, provided they have the invoices to support their claims.

Now, businesses have to follow-up with non-compliant vendors on a monthly basis to upload their invoices in the form GSTR 2A.
Harpreet Singh, partner at KPMG, said, “Restriction of mismatched ITC by 20 per cent would necessitate undertaking monthly reconciliation of purchase, credit register with GSTR 2A, and hence may increase the monthly compliance burden.”

He said the move would also restrict credit, which was rightly availed of but did not get reflected in the GSTR 2A form, on account of default by vendors may result in adverse cash flow impact.

The GST collections fell to a 19-month low of Rs 91,916 crore in September, pointing towards deepening economic slowdown. It was the second straight month of revenue collections falling below the Rs 1-trillion mark, compounding the government’s revenue woes amid steep collection target for the fiscal. The target is over Rs 1.1 trillion a month.

In the first six months till September, GST grew by 4.9 per cent year-on-year.

The government in August had extended the date for filing annual GST returns for 2017-18 and 20018-19 by three months to November 30, as taxpayers were facing technical problems in furnishing returns. In fact, the government postponed the deadline a number of times. The original deadline of filing these returns were December 31, 2018.

GSTR-9 is an annual return to be filed yearly by taxpayers registered under the GST. It consists of details regarding the outward and inward supplies made or received under different tax heads.

The form GSTR-9C is filed by those with an annual turnover of above Rs 2 crore. It is a statement of reconciliation between GSTR-9 and the audited annual financial statement, while GSTR-9A is the annual return to be filed those who have opted for the Composition Scheme under GST.

The deadlines were extended after the businesses and experts complained about the complex nature of filing these returns and reconciliation of audited accounts with these returns. For instance, tax and legal consultants had said hundreds of amendments, notifications and circulars have made the GST Act very complex.

Officials of the Tax Bar Association, a body of over 400 members of chartered accountants, company secretaries, cost advocates and tax consultants, had said that the government has made the entire GST procedure and filing of returns very “confusing with hundreds of changes in the rules and taxes”.

Source: Business-Standard.

Signup for XaTTaX 30-day
free trial

XaTTaX – One stop GST solution

Participation Fees for Conference Organized by Educational Institutions leviable to GST: AAR

Participation Fees for Conference Organized by Educational Institutions leviable to GST: AAR

The Madhya Pradesh Authority of Advance Ruling in an application filed by M/s Emrald Heights international School held that GST shall be leviable on consideration received by the school for participation in a conference organized.

The issue before the Authority is whether the consideration received by the school from the participant school(s) for the participation of their students and staff in the conference would be exempted under Entry No. 66/1/80 of the Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate). The second issue is concerning the applicable tax rate if the supply is not exempted.

The bench constituting of Hon’ble Members Shri Rajiv Agrawal and Shri Manoj Kumar Choubey held that the activities of holding Educational conference/ gathering of students, faculty and staff of other Schools are not exempt under relevant clauses of Entry 66/1/8 of the above-mentioned notification for the simple reason that the education conference does not fall under any of the categories so listed. Hence, GST shall be chargeable on the consideration received by the school from the participant school(s) for the participation of their students and staff in the impugned conference.

The Hon’ble Bench further stated that various services provided for organizing an educational conference/gathering of students and staff of other Schools, shall be liable to tax at the rate applicable to the respective services. For example, the catering services shall be liable to tax @ 5% without eligibility for Input Tax Credit.

Source: Taxscan

XaTTaX is Best GST Software, Simplify your Financial matters with GST eFiling Software for Return Filing & GST Billing Software in India.

  • Automate Invoicing and get Paid Faster
  • Integration with all popular accounting software
  • Manage your GST and E-WayBill Software anytime anywhere using multiple devices

Get Our GST Software DEMO and E-WAY BILL DEMO for FREE

Indirect tax board removes circular on GST, but confusion remains.

Indirect tax board removes circular on GST, but confusion remains.

The indirect tax board had removed a “controversial” circular that imposed goods and services tax (GST) on post-sale discounts by dealers, but it has done little to clear the confusion around the many issues that arose with the circular.

In June, the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) had issued a circular which said that dealers will have to pay 18 per cent GST on the post-sale discount that they get from the suppliers of goods, if the supplier asks them to pass on the concessions to the end consumer.

The circular came out with different situations where GST should be paid and where it should not.

For instance, imagine that a company sells a car to a dealer for Rs 10 lakh and later gives a discount of Rs 50,000. In doing so, the firm did not put any obligation on the dealer to pass on the benefit. So, the dealer need not pay any GST on Rs 50,000. However, if the company asks the dealer to pass on the benefit to the customer, then the dealer has to pay GST on the entire amount, including Rs 50,000.

The Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) had said This had irked industry, particularly the auto sector, which has already been reeling under the pressure of subdued demand.

this circular violated the cardinal principle of GST that the tax cost is to be borne by the ultimate consumer.

“This principle means that the supply of goods or service should suffer the tax only to the extent of consideration paid by the ultimate consumer,” the CII had said, demanding that this provision in the circular be changed.

It said additional discounts are generally given to liquidate the old inventories or push products under weak market conditions.

Following the hue and cry, the CBIC recently said: “Numerous representations were received expressing apprehensions on the implementation of the said circular. In view of these apprehensions… the Board… hereby withdraws, ab initio, the circular.”

But even after the withdrawal of the circular, the controversy over it has not ended. Experts demanded that a clarification be issued that there would be no GST on post-sale discounts as field officers continue to harass dealers.

Abhishek Jain, partner at EY, said industry expects that with the withdrawal of the circular, the government has accepted the industry’s position and this would put an end to the investigations and litigation at the field level.

Also, there is the issue of input tax credit.

ClearTax chief executive officer Archit Gupta said now there is confusion over how the situation of post-sale discounts should be dealt with.

The tax on the original invoice could have still been claimed as input tax credit and be adjusted using the credit note. This is now not perceived so by the withdrawal of the circular, he said.

“The festive season is here, and hence, there is a dire need for the CBIC to come back with a clear message for the businesses and the dealers in the supply chain to deal with the circular,” he said.

Source: Business-Standard.

XaTTaX is Best GST Software, Simplify your Financial matters with GST eFiling Software for Return Filing & GST Billing Software in India.

  • Automate Invoicing and get Paid Faster
  • Integration with all popular accounting software
  • Manage your GST and E-WayBill Software anytime anywhere using multiple devices

Get Our GST Software DEMO and E-WAY BILL DEMO for FREE

The GST’s initial premise should be revisited

The GST’s initial premise should be revisited

When the GST was launched in July 1, 2017 with the promise to simplify our incredibly complex indirect tax system and unify the country through a single indirect tax, the nation supported the new disruptive tax regime the way it had supported demonetisation, setting aside the creeping doubts that were upsetting many businesses. The GST system was built on the simple premise of automatic matching of the invoices submitted by suppliers and buyers, enabling automatic processing of input tax credits (ITC) and refunds by the Infosys-built GST Network (GSTN) portal, the IT architecture that is the backbone of implementation. The GSTN was supposed to minimise frauds, curtail evasion, end harassment of taxpayers and corruption, and bring in transparency, leading to an increase in revenues, which would enable the government to lower rates and converge slabs, finally culminating in a single rate, one nation-one tax system, making it truly a “good and simple tax”.

Two years down the line, most of the promises, however, still remain only on paper. The GSTN has turned out to be miserably inadequate to fulfil its role due to the inefficiencies of the software. The automatic matching of invoices was junked only after a few months, when the returns for outward supplies (GSTR-1) and inward supplies (GSTR-2) could not be matched by the GSTN, and hence the refund of the ITC could not be processed, blocking scarce capital for millions of taxpayers. For easier transition to the new regime, a simple return — the GSTR 3B — was introduced only as a temporary measure while the GSTR-2 was suspended, so that the ITC refund could be made by using only the GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B.

The 3B return, however, has no validation whatsoever in the system, making it open to frauds and evasion that the automatic and complete matching between the GSTR-1 and GSTR-2 was supposed to have eliminated. In fact, the CAG, citing numerous instances of false ITC claims in his Report No, 11 of 2019 has said as much, emphasising that the rollback of invoice matching without any safeguards had rendered it prone to frauds. The self-correcting mechanism of complete invoice matching is a critical requirement of the system, in the absence of which the ITC is claimed by the taxpayer purely on a self-assessment basis without any system validation.

Curbing tax evasion

There have even been efforts to rationalise the incompetence of the system and institutionalise its inefficiencies. A former member of the Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs (CBIC) has argued that no country in the world has a complete invoice-matching system which is impractical. It is further asserted that major taxpayers such as public enterprises and private players like the Tata group, the Birla group, Mahindra & Mahindra, Hero, Infosys etc, who together pay 80 per cent of the GST, are not tax-evaders; hence, instead of wasting system resources on universal invoice matching, an intensive audit of their accounts equally serves the purpose.

Besides, it is claimed that in sectors like automobiles, steel or services, there is no scope for evasion since components and final products, or contracts and purchases, match perfectly. It is only in the sectors that sell products piecemeal, like soaps or toothpastes, that universal matching should be made mandatory; for all others, an intelligence-based checking, along with comprehensive auditing, should be far more effective than universal invoice matching. The alleged large-scale falsification of invoices has been dismissed as “absurdly illogical” and “only good English”.

Fake invoices

The arguments are as vicious as they are absurd. If universal invoice matching was impractical in the first place, why was the system designed upon this very premise? The argument that big players are all virtuous and small players are all evaders is dangerous to say the least — it is an inevitable step towards lobbying and patronage distribution, unfettered discretion, harassment and extortion — in fact, it is an insane prescription to institutionalise corruption and perpetuate very aberrations the GST regime was designed to thwart. There is also complete ignorance of the huge frauds and evasion resulting from fake invoices, which tax officials are struggling hard to curb.

In fact, the Minister of State for Finance has himself stated in Parliament that frauds amounting to ₹45,683 crore were unearthed since the launch of the GST. The CBIC Member (Investigation) had admitted that between April 2018 and February 2019, evasion of ₹20,000 crore was detected, of which ₹10,000 crore were recovered. A thriving ecosystem of fake companies using fake invoices has grown luxuriantly for claiming ITC; no sooner are the refunds claimed that these companies disappear into the thin air.

Only last week, ₹470 crore of evasion and fake invoices of ₹3,500 crore were uncovered by the tax authorities. There is something much more serious than “good English” at stake here, and the focus should be on addressing these serious structural deficiencies.

Source: The-Hindu-Business-Line

XaTTaX is Best GST Software, Simplify your Financial matters with GST eFiling Software for Return Filing & GST Billing Software in India.

  • Automate Invoicing and get Paid Faster
  • Integration with all popular accounting software
  • Manage your GST and E-WayBill Software anytime anywhere using multiple devices

Get Our GST Software DEMO and E-WAY BILL DEMO for FREE

e-Way bills curb tax evasion, but glitches remain

e-Way bills curb tax evasion, but glitches remain

There are numerous concerns on the functioning of the GST regime, launched two years ago. But the e-Way bill’s system is displaying good traction. While there are a few glitches, users mostly agree that e-Way bills have brought down under-reporting and increased transparency.

The system was rolled out for inter-State consignments in April 2018, and for intra-State consignments two months later, in a phased manner. e-Way bills generation for the period April-June 2019 was almost 40 per cent higher at about 15.65 crore, compared to 11.19 crore in the same period last year.

For transport companies, the system has saved considerable time, removing check-posts and facilitating the shift from a ‘departmental policing model’ to a ‘self-declaration model’. It has also helped in curbing tax evasion.

According to chartered accountant Chirag Chauhan, e-Way bills have reduced tax evasion by almost 80 per cent. He also points out that the drop in GST collections of just 2-5 per cent in the first quarter of FY20, against a sales decrease of 15-20 per cent, is proof that tax malpractices have come down.

Under the norms, every consignment worth above ₹50,000 (raised to ₹1 lakh in a few States as a temporary relief) should begin with the generation of an e-Way bill. The bill must be raised before the goods are shipped and should include details of the products, their consignor, recipient and transporter. Though check-posts have been abolished under GST, a consignment can be intercepted at any point for the verification of its e-Way bill. If found without one, or with invoice discrepancies, a penalty of ₹10,000, or tax sought to be evaded, or, in some cases, 200 per cent of the GST amount, can be levied. These provisions are helping in reducing the disparities between the actual value of the sale and that reported in e-Way bills. Every e-Way bill generated has to be matched at the invoice level with the entries uploaded by the manufacturers or traders in their monthly GSTR-1 returns for outward supplies. Also, the GSTR-1 of the manufacturer or trader gets auto- populated in the GSTR-2A of the purchaser, based on which the latter claims the input tax credit (ITC).

Due to such matching of invoices at multiple levels, there’s hardly any scope for the supplier to under-report sales.

Once the e-Way bill portal is linked to the centralised VAHAN portal, which contains vehicles details, generation of fake e-Way bills gets checked. Further, the system helps in increasing the overall GST compliance, as a recent notification bars a supplier or a recipient from generating an e-Way bill if the GST returns are not filed for two consecutive months.

Some challenges do remain. Complaints have been raised that the time limits prescribed for the validity of an e-Way bill are not in consonance with ground realities.

Time limit

“Genuine reasons for delays should be taken into account while fixing the time limits,” Bal Malkit Singh, former President of the All India Motor Transport Congress, told BusinessLine.

On consignment verification issues, he said: “State borders have paved the way for flying squads and, the vehicles are being stopped randomly on the pretext of checking for collateral extortion.” Another issue, he said, is the lack of flexibility in rectifying errors and changing the destination address.

XaTTaX: Cloud and On-Premises Based GST Filing Software For India

Source: The-Hindu-Business-Line
GST: Restrictions on ITC claim if you do not file GSTR 1 on time

GST: Restrictions on ITC claim if you do not file GSTR 1 on time

The GST Council, in its 37th meeting held at Goa, has come up with various proposals to simplify and strengthen the tax filing system and one such decision is aimed at ensuring taxpayers file their GSTR 1 in time.

“In order to nudge taxpayers to timely file their statement of outward supplies, imposition of restrictions on availment of input tax credit by the recipients in cases where details of outward supplies are not furnished by the suppliers in the statement under section 37 of the CGST Act, 2017,” a statement said. This means when taxpayers do not file a GSTR 1, they would not be able to claim input tax credit.

According to Archit Gupta, Founder and CEO – ClearTax, there will be restrictions on ITC claim for those who fail to submit GSTR-1. “ITC will only be allowed to be claimed where outward supplies have been reported by your suppliers. This is an important step to ensure validity of ITC claim in the system and sets the stage for the new simplified return filing mechanism. Those whose suppliers do not submit GSTR-1 will be restricted from availing ITC credit,” says Gupta.

Incidentally the Government on Friday said, the New return system that was to be introduced in October 2019, would now be introduced from April, 2020. This is in order to give ample opportunity to taxpayers as well as the system to adapt and accordingly specifying the due date for furnishing of return in FORM GSTR-3B and details of outward supplies in FORM GSTR-1 for the period October, 2019 – March, 2020.

“With the Government now showing full intention to plug ITC leakages, businesses cannot do without a robust mechanism that will keep suppliers in check and make sure they are complying in a timely manner,” says Gupta.

Other announcements:

The GST Council provided much-needed relief to MSMEs by allowing them waiver to file GSTR 9 and GSTR-9A. Announcing the relaxation in filing of annual returns for MSMEs for FY 2017-18 and FY 2018-19, a statement said waiver of the requirement of filing FORM GSTR-9A for Composition Taxpayers for the said tax periods will be provided.

Additionally, filing of FORM GSTR-9 for those taxpayers who (are required to file the said return but) have aggregate turnover up to Rs. 2 crore made optional for the said tax periods.

Other important decision taken at the Council meeting include setting a Committee of Officers to examine the simplification of Forms for Annual Return and reconciliation statement and extension of last date for filing of appeals against orders of Appellate Authority before the GST Appellate Tribunal as the Appellate Tribunals are yet not functional.

Source: Economic-Times.

XaTTaX is Best GST Software, Simplify your Financial matters with GST eFiling Software for Return Filing & GST Billing Software in India.

  • Automate Invoicing and get Paid Faster
  • Integration with all popular accounting software
  • Manage your GST and E-WayBill Software anytime anywhere using multiple devices

Get Our GST Software DEMO and E-WAY BILL DEMO for FREE

× How can I help you?